[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what about the mldonkey package?



On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:20:47PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> Salut à tous,
> 
> > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 08:47:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:37:05AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > > > ps : concerning upload to debian, i prefer to be sure of the quality of
> > > > the 1st version of mldonkey to enter unstable, because, first user will
> > > > judge mldonkey on this first package ( if i fail, i will lose all
> > > > credibility for this package ).
> > > 
> > > Notice that :
> > > 
> > >   1) Once you upload the packages, you will have to wait a few weeks for
> > >   it to be read by James Troup or another ftp master and then added to
> > >   the override file, if there is no problems or such.
> > > 
> > >   2) If it works and is lintian clean, what are you afraid with regard
> > >   to quality ? Anyway, you can always do some package checking during
> > >   the time the package is sitting in NEW, and upload a fixed version
> > >   once it has been accepted or even before that.
> > > 
> > 
> > MLDonkey quality is not very stable. For example, 2.4.2 seems to crash
> > from time to time ( i have just restarted one, because it just has
> > crashed ).
> 
> I think the stable versions have only two numbers.
> For example, last stable version is 2.5. Don't know if it's worth packaging
               ^^^^
	       next ? As current is 2.4.3 ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: