Bug#262791: marked as done (rebuild with libtiff4, upload with urgency=medium)
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 08:58:43 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] 20040802065842.GB21279@pegasos>
and subject line Bug#262791: rebuild with libtiff4, upload with urgency=medium
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 00:14:46 +0000
>From ejb@ql.org Sun Aug 01 17:14:46 2004
Return-path: <ejb@ql.org>
Received: from lakermmtao09.cox.net [68.230.240.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrQTW-0004ce-00; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:14:46 -0700
Received: from gwendolyn.in.ql.org ([68.100.32.28]) by lakermmtao09.cox.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709)
with ESMTP
id <20040802001414.ITOS21435.lakermmtao09.cox.net@gwendolyn.in.ql.org>
for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:14 -0400
Received: from soup.in.ql.org (soup.in.ql.org [10.160.59.17])
by gwendolyn.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i720EFHp019980
for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:15 -0400
Received: from soup.in.ql.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i720EEGc011134
for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:14 -0400
Received: (from ejb@localhost)
by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i720EEup011130;
Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:14 -0400
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:14 -0400
From: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: rebuild with libtiff4, upload with urgency=medium
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040801201414.0498032960.qww314159@soup>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Severity: Serious
Justification: FTBFS
Package: libcamlimages-ocaml
As of version 2.12-2, package libcamlimages-ocaml has not yet been
rebuilt with libtiff4. Please rebuild the package with libtiff4 and
upload with urgency=medium. Note that taking care of this problem is
a prerequisite for ultimately being included in sarge, even if a
version of this package already appears in testing. No source changes
are required; updating dependencies and rebuilding should be
sufficient. All packages not uploaded within several days will be
NMUed. Many thanks for your patience and cooperation.
All maintainers and package tracking system addresses for affected
packages have been previously notified. As a reminder, here is a copy
of that original notification (slightly edited). Note that since this
was sent out, there have been various other threads on both
debian-devel and debian-release.
---
An accidental ABI change was made in libtiff (upstream) between
version 3.5.7 (the version currently in sarge) and 3.6.1 (the version
currently in sid). This has resulted in 10 merged release-critical
bugs filed against libtiff3g for packages that don't work correctly
when compiled with one of these versions and run with the other.
Unfortunately, since this problem has been left unresolved for some
time, many packages have been compiled with 3.6.1 in sid and have
transitioned into sarge where they may not work correctly with 3.5.7.
Some of these packages are known to work correctly in sid but not in
sarge. Transitioning version 3.6.1 of libtiff into sarge is
unaccaptable because it would create incompatbility with woody and
third-party applications that were compiled with libtiff 3.5.7 or
earlier.
To ensure that this problem is fully corrected, sarge will not contain
a libtiff.so.3. Version 3.6.1 of libtiff will be included as
libtiff.so.4, with support of upstream. All packages that depend upon
libtiff3g or libtiff3g-dev will have to be rebuilt with libtiff4 or
libtiff4-dev. Doing this update is a precondition for the package
being included in sarge. Please note that there were no source-level
interface changes between 3.5.7 and 3.6.1, so it should be sufficient
to just update the dependencies and recompile. Use urgency=medium
when making this change.
It will be important for these changes to be made quickly as, once the
new tiff packages are uploaded, many packages will no longer be
installable or buildable from source. As such, release-critical bugs
(severity serous, justification FTBFS) will be filed against any
package that still depends upon libtiff3g or libtiff3g-dev a few days
after the upload of the new tiff packages, and any packages that have
not been fixed and uploaded within approximately one week will be
NMUed. Once all packages that depend upon libtiff have appeared in
sid, all these packages will be able to transition into sarge
together.
For additional background information on this solution, please see
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/07/msg00071.html>
and its associated thread. For more information on the problem
itself, please see
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=236247>
--
Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
http://www.ql.org/q/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 262791-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 06:55:21 +0000
>From sven.luther@wanadoo.fr Sun Aug 01 23:55:21 2004
Return-path: <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0903.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrWjB-00048A-00; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:55:21 -0700
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-45-132.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.154.132])
by mwinf0903.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id 0F93418001BC; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 08:54:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from luther by pegasos with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BrWmR-0005Xd-5D; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 08:58:43 +0200
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 08:58:43 +0200
To: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>, 262791-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#262791: rebuild with libtiff4, upload with urgency=medium
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040802065842.GB21279@pegasos>
References: <[🔎] 20040801201414.0498032960.qww314159@soup>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040801201414.0498032960.qww314159@soup>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Delivered-To: 262791-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:14:14PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> Severity: Serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Package: libcamlimages-ocaml
>
> As of version 2.12-2, package libcamlimages-ocaml has not yet been
> rebuilt with libtiff4. Please rebuild the package with libtiff4 and
> upload with urgency=medium. Note that taking care of this problem is
> a prerequisite for ultimately being included in sarge, even if a
> version of this package already appears in testing. No source changes
> are required; updating dependencies and rebuilding should be
> sufficient. All packages not uploaded within several days will be
> NMUed. Many thanks for your patience and cooperation.
Bullshit, camlimage 2.12-6 is in unstable, and built against libtiff4. Closing
this bug report because of it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: