[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#357634: Please add mips/mipsel (and others) to control (or make it "any")



Package: spamoracle
Version: 1.4-7

Can you please add mips/mipsel to the control file?  In fact, you may
want to check the arches ocaml-nox is available on and add all of them
to debian/control... which leads me to the next point: I think you
should just make this package "architecture: any".


> Automatic build of spamoracle_1.4-7 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94
...
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture mips
>  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dpatch  deapply-all  
> manpage not applied to ./ .
> build not applied to ./ .
> rm -rf patch-stamp patch-stampT debian/patched
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
> /usr/bin/make clean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4'
> rm -f spamoracle
> rm -f spamoracle.byte
> rm -f wordsplit.mll
> rm -f wordsplit.ml
> rm -f htmlscan.ml
> rm -f *.cm[iox] *.o
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4'
> dh_clean
>  debian/rules build
> test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched
> dpatch  apply-all  
> applying patch build to ./ ... ok.
> applying patch manpage to ./ ... ok.
> dpatch  cat-all  >>patch-stampT
> mv -f patch-stampT patch-stamp
> dh_testdir
> #./configure --host=mips-linux-gnu --build=mips-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
> touch configure-stamp
> dh_testdir
> #/usr/bin/make OCAMLC=ocamlc spamoracle.byte
> /usr/bin/make spamoracle.byte
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4'
> ocamlc -g -c configfile.mli
> ocamlc -g -c configfile.ml
> ocamlc -g -c config.mli
> ocamlc -g -c config.ml
> ocamllex htmlscan.mll
> 29 states, 882 transitions, table size 3702 bytes
> ocamlc -g -c htmlscan.mli
> ocamlc -g -c htmlscan.ml
> ocamlc -g -c mail.mli
> ocamlc -g -c mail.ml
> ocamlc -g -c database.mli
> ocamlc -g -c database.ml
> File "database.ml", line 124, characters 8-19:
> Warning Y: unused variable f.
> File "database.ml", line 128, characters 8-19:
> Warning Y: unused variable f.
> ocamlc -g -c mbox.mli
> ocamlc -g -c mbox.ml
> gcc -E -P -DFRENCH -DSPANISH -DITALIAN -DGERMAN -DPORTUGUESE -DJAPANESE - < wordsplit.mlp > wordsplit.mll \
>         || { rm -f wordsplit.mll; exit 2; }
> ocamllex wordsplit.mll
> 85 states, 8532 transitions, table size 34638 bytes
> ocamlc -g -c wordsplit.mli
> ocamlc -g -c wordsplit.ml
> ocamlc -g -c rankmsg.mli
> ocamlc -g -c rankmsg.ml
> ocamlc -g -c attachments.mli
> ocamlc -g -c attachments.ml
> ocamlc -g -c processing.mli
> ocamlc -g -c processing.ml
> ocamlc -g -c main.ml
> ocamlc -g -o spamoracle.byte unix.cma str.cma configfile.cmo config.cmo htmlscan.cmo mail.cmo database.cmo mbox.cmo wordsplit.cmo rankmsg.cmo attachments.cmo processing.cmo main.cmo
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4'
> if [ -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt ]; then \
> 		/usr/bin/make spamoracle; \
> 	fi
> touch build-stamp
>  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_clean -k
> dh_installdirs
> # Add here commands to install the package into debian/advi.
> if [ -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt ]; then \
> 		/usr/bin/make install DESTDIR=/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4/debian/spamoracle; \
> 	fi
> /usr/bin/make install.byte DESTDIR=/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4/debian/spamoracle-byte
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4'
> cp spamoracle.byte /build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4/debian/spamoracle-byte/usr/bin/spamoracle
> cp spamoracle.1 /build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4/debian/spamoracle-byte/usr/share/man/man1/spamoracle.1
> cp spamoracle.conf.5 /build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4/debian/spamoracle-byte/usr/share/man/man5/spamoracle.conf.5
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4'
> install -m 644 debian/spamoracle-byte.override \
> 		/build/tbm/spamoracle-1.4/debian/spamoracle-byte/usr/share/lintian/overrides/spamoracle-byte
> dh_testdir -s
> dh_testdir: I have no package to build
> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



Reply to: