Re: [Fwd: [Pkg-ocaml-maint-commits] [SCM] libfuse-ocaml packaging branch, debian, updated. debian/0.2-1-1-g0b81018]
Le Sunday 31 May 2009 16:21:58 Mehdi Dogguy, vous avez écrit :
> On 0, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
> > If it weren't for the Pkg-ocaml-maint policy that all packages are to
> > be debian packages this would be a native package. It is bad enough
> > the source is split between 2 git repositories. I'm not going to split
> > changelogs as well.
>
> That's your opinion. I'm waiting for a confirmation from a DD.
> I doubt any DD will agree with you (on this particular package).
I agree that upstream changelog and debian changelog are two different things.
For our (savonet) modules, we have a seperate changelog for each, and "new
upstream release" entries.
This is particularly reasonable because you can have several debian packages
for a single upstream release. For the same reason we request to remove the
debian/ directory from upstream.
If you want to propose your code to people outside of debian, I think it is
reasonable to split in two changelogs, hence.
Romain
Reply to: