[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#574380: edos-distcheck: Wrong output for | alternative?



On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 22:06:47 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:58:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> > There are cases where some build-essential package is not installable if
> > you only look at the Packages file, but where this should be ignored
> > because build-essential packages are already installed on the buildd, so
> > the installability of their versions in the Packages file is irrelevant.
> 
> wasn't that due to the fact that, in the past, one only looked at the
> Packages file of available packages, without taking into account
> the packages that are already installed on the machine? I thought
> that the solution is to feed to edos-builddebcheck the combination of
> available packages + installed packages.
> 
The script runs on buildd.d.o, once for each arch.  It doesn't run on
each individual buildd.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: