[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#842776: marked as done (libdose3-ocaml-dev is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 2 Nov 2016 23:51:47 +0100
with message-id <f5d88c99-644e-4888-5435-a321650cd78e@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#842776: libdose3-ocaml-dev is uninstallable
has caused the Debian Bug report #842776,
regarding libdose3-ocaml-dev is uninstallable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
842776: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libdose3-ocaml-dev
Version: 5.0.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

libdose3-ocaml-dev in unstable depends on
libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev-i0qi0:amd64. This is provided by
libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev 1.8.6-1+b1 but a recent binNMU introduced
libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev 1.8.6-1+b2. Thus, dose3 needs a rebuild with the
new ocamlgraph version to fix this problem.

Thanks!

cheers, josch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 02/11/2016 23:48, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (2016-11-02 23:46:15)
>> I may have missed something... but why not requesting a rebuild of the package
>> instead of opening this bug? Is there anything else to do besides doing the
>> binNMU?
> 
> probably not. It was just a long time since I last filed a request for a binNMU
> and at the time I reported this I was pressed for time but didn't want to
> forget about this, so I just quickly filed this bug against src:dose3.
> 

Ok, thanks for the confirmation!

I've now scheduled the binNMU and will close this bugreport.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: