[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#170044: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error"



Quoting Chris Halls (halls@debian.org):
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error:
> > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so: symbol _ZN3psp10PrinterGfxC1Ev,
> > version LIBPSPRINT_1_0 not defined in file libpsp641li.so with link time
> > reference
> 
> I'm seeing something very similar in my builds of 643.  Did you build the
> .debs yourself on your system or download the .debs from our mirrors?

bubulle@mykerinos:~> dpkg -s openoffice.org
Package: openoffice.org
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: contrib/editors
Installed-Size: 31680
Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team <debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org>
Version: 1.0.1-5.6rc1

I have the following in my /etc/apt/sources.list, from the time OO
wasn't in sid (is it now? I cannot check while I write this)

# OpenOffice
# deb ftp://ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice unstable main contrib
deb ftp://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice unstable main contrib

So, yes I probably got the package from one mirror. 

I'm maybe outdated and should remove this entry from my sources.list
file and just use sid packages (if they now exist, do they?). On the
other hand, if official packages now exist, you probably gave them
higher version numbers than experimental packages.

(for quick answer today, please keep CC'ed my work address, thanks)

Just a small thanks anyway the the great work on OO packaging. I'm
aware of the work needed by packaging "small" and not widely used
programs...so packaging a monster like OO is a work I cannot even
imagine..:-)


-- 
Christian Perrier
Debian geneweb and lifelines packages maintainer



Reply to: