severity 427053 important
thanks
paddor wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-help-km
> Version: 2.1~rc2-1
As you maybe have guessed, that is a complete obsolete package. You did see the
version number, didn't you?
$ rmadison openoffice.org-l10n-km
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 | etch-m68k | all
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1 | stable | all
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7 | testing | all
openoffice.org-l10n-km | 2.1~rc2-1 | experimental | all
Not in sid, testings version doesn't have that problem, and the package from experimental
is cruft.
> I think there is a typo in the category-specification of this package.
> In aptitude, it appears like the folowing:
>
> --------------------------------------
> --\ %CONTRIB%doc
> --\ main - Die Debian-Distribution
> p openoffice.org-help-km ....
> --------------------------------------
Yes. And it's a completely obsolete package it should be removed. See
the bugs on ftp.debian.org for this:
* #421246: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM; NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <gq@cs.msu.su>; Merged with #421629, #421696, #422138, #425853; 35
days old.
* #421629: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM; NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>; Merged with #421246, #421696, #422138, #425853; 32
days old.
* #421669: RM: binutils/experimental -- RoM
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: "peter green" <plugwash@p10link.net>; 31 days old.
* #421696: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM; NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>; Merged with #421246, #421629, #422138, #425853; 31
days old.
* #422138: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM; NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Vincent Fourmond <fourmond@debian.org>; Merged with #421246, #421629, #421696, #425853;
29 days old.
* #422562: RM: mysql-admin, mysql-query-browser -- RoM; superseded by mysql-gui-tools
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: Adam Majer <adamm@zombino.com>; 25 days old.
* #425853: RM: openoffice.org:openoffice.org-help-km/experimental -- RoM; NBS
Package: ftp.debian.org; Severity: important; Reported by: EmaRsk <emarsk@gmail.com>; Merged with #421246, #421629, #421696, #422138; 8 days old.
Is it *really* so hard to look whether a removal request was already filed for
a completely obsolet package which somehow didn't get removed automatically as it
should? Easily seeable by the version and the fact that the package is not even installable.
(simply because it's 2.1)
If the ftpmasters actually would do anything wrt removals I would not get more of those
useless bugreports.
I think I need to keep this open for openoffice.org-l10n-km to prevent more bugs like
this (note that this is not fixable anymore by me) filed against openoffice.org-l10n-km.
*SIGH*
Gr�gards,
Ren�-
.''`. Ren�ngelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature