[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#453080: wrong solution



reopen 453080
reassign 453080 myspell-de-at,hunspell-de-at
found 453080 20070829-1
tag 453080 + confirmed
thanks

Hi,

Roland Ambrosch wrote:
> thanks for your fast answers.
> I tried figuring out where I got these versions from and my apt-cacher 
> tells that I have them from ftp.at.debian.org/testing. The problem came up 
> because these packages don't depend on myspell-de-de.

Indeed, I didn't check again since I knew that I added the depends but
it got removed by Roland in 20070829-1. Roland, can you explain why
exactly? What is "in the past"? We should not care about old (< etch)
hunspells...
With this change you broke openoffice.org, because it tried to load a
dictionary which is not existing ans Xulrunner/Ice*/enchant will not be
able to use it too I guess.

Indeed, there is no de_AT.aff in myspell-de-at at all... (de-AT.aff is
uninteresting for OOo but would be broken to since it's a symlink to
de_AT.aff). The OOo info file references de_AT, though and
Xulrunner/Iice* will also expect a working de-AT.aff:

rene@frodo:/usr/share/myspell/dicts$ cat ../infos/ooo/myspell-de-at 
DICT de AT de_AT

> Is it a problem with the mirror?
>
> myspell-de-at:
>   Installed: 20070829-3
>   Candidate: 20070829-3

No, it's fine. It just that you reported a bug against
*openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at* which is *NOT* a real package in
Debian (but there once, at woody/sarge development times one, so I got
confused - ans I didn't really look at the version number, my bad, sorry)

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: