[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#836531: Bugs needs reopening, fix is not a real fix (IMHO)



On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:26:39AM +0200, Christoph Gutjahr wrote:
> The bug described in 836531 has been marked as fixed, but there are two

No, it hasn't. It has been reopened one week ago already,

> If libreoffice-gtk2 is now a requirement on XFCE, shouldn't the update
> process make sure that it is present?

There's no "upgrade process". apt upgrades packages, and if you didn't have
-gtk or -gtk2 installed before, apt can't know that it should install -gtk2

And as said, if you have -gtk3 installed, even if -gtk2 is there, too,
it takes precedence, so..

> The second and more important problem is that the guy submitting the
> bug report didn't make it clear that libreoffice-gtk3 was working
> perfectly fine with XFCE until a day or two ago - I've been using that

He did.

> setup for ages without problems. The actual bug is that it suddenly
> started misbehaving (the GUI being extremely slow being one fault, but
> not the only one). And since all my other GTK3 applications are working
> perfectly fine with XFCE, I don't see how this could be a general "GTK3
> vs. XFCE" problem.

> 
Well, LO does "special things" and renders stuff by itself. It's not
a "typical" Gtk application.

> Refer to bug 837356  for a report filed a few days ago about "gtk3
> being slow" - from a Gnome 3 user.

Which I wasn't able to act on, yet.

> Please reopen 836531 and/or merge it with 837356. Also, since XFCE is

It was already. One week ago.

> already (slowly) moving towards GTK3 and is indeed already shipping
> GTK3 based modules...
> 
> https://wiki.xfce.org/releng/4.14/roadmap

How useful without dates.. ;)

But good to know.

> ...libreoffice-gtk3 should of course be a fallback for XFCE.

Only when that happened. But I will revert the patch anyway, as it apparently
didn't help.

> Apologies for the lengthy mail, but I don't have an account for the
> bugtracker yet, it's 5am and I'm about to head out of town.

That might explain why you git the bug status wrong ;)

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: