Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#956586: Problems upgrading LibreOffice from "1:6.1.5-3+deb10u5" to "1:6.4.2-3"
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 956586 src:libreoffice
Bug #956586 [libreoffice] Problems upgrading LibreOffice from "1:6.1.5-3+deb10u5" to "1:6.4.2-3"
Bug reassigned from package 'libreoffice' to 'src:libreoffice'.
No longer marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u5.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #956586 to the same values previously set
> retitle 956586 buster -> bullseye upgrade deinstalls -gtk2 without installing -gtk3
Bug #956586 [src:libreoffice] Problems upgrading LibreOffice from "1:6.1.5-3+deb10u5" to "1:6.4.2-3"
Changed Bug title to 'buster -> bullseye upgrade deinstalls -gtk2 without installing -gtk3' from 'Problems upgrading LibreOffice from "1:6.1.5-3+deb10u5" to "1:6.4.2-3"'.
> severity 956586 minor
Bug #956586 [src:libreoffice] buster -> bullseye upgrade deinstalls -gtk2 without installing -gtk3
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
> tag 956586 + wonftix
Unknown tag/s: wonftix.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ignore etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore jessie jessie-ignore stretch stretch-ignore buster buster-ignore bullseye bullseye-ignore bookworm bookworm-ignore.
Bug #956586 [src:libreoffice] buster -> bullseye upgrade deinstalls -gtk2 without installing -gtk3
Requested to add no tags; doing nothing.
> found 956586 1:6.4.0~alpha1-0reprotest1
Bug #956586 [src:libreoffice] buster -> bullseye upgrade deinstalls -gtk2 without installing -gtk3
Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:6.4.0~alpha1-0reprotest1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
956586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956586
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: