Re: Rebooting Low-Hanging Fruits sessions
- To: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Rebooting Low-Hanging Fruits sessions
- From: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:40:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 851tqlm70n.fsf@boum.org>
- In-reply-to: <20140920000947.GU1024@urchin.earth.li> (Dominic Hargreaves's message of "Sat, 20 Sep 2014 01:09:47 +0100")
- References: <851ts3i1jt.fsf@boum.org> <20140919152951.GV8643@jadzia.comodo.priv.at> <20140920000947.GU1024@urchin.earth.li>
Hi,
(I'm sorry for having been unable to follow-up on this earlier, and at
the same time I'm *very* happy that it happened anyway. Congrats!)
Dominic Hargreaves wrote (20 Sep 2014 00:09:47 GMT) :
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 05:29:51PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:49:26 -0700, intrigeri wrote:
>> > at 22:00 UTC (which is late evening in Europe, and late afternoon
>> > on the US/Canada East coast).
>>
>> Do we have agreed on a time? I remember some Europeans saying that
>> midnight is not so good if the next day is a workday.
> There didn't really seem to be a consensus on the list, from what
> I remember. I don't think it will work to always have it at the same time,
> or some people will never be able to make it.
OK. Shall we try to alternate 17:00 UTC and 22:00 UTC, then? From what
I've seen expressed in this thread, this would basically allow
everyone to attend at least every second LHF session.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Reply to: