You could have started a new thread, it's not that we we have a limit on threads on our mailing lists :)
Haha good point -- I just saw your offer to help with Mikko's
package and jumped at it. My mistake. :)
Actually I tried to figure out how to do the packaging myself a while ago, but something wasn't working for me (a form URL was timing out IIRC) so I gave up.Sounds, hm, interesting :) (We can't -- technically and by policy -- use online resources during build.)
I don't recall exactly what the problem was (this was a few years
ago). Maybe I was trying to sign up for some kind of ID or
something (?).
Yes, this could work too. Initially I thought to keep them separate, thinking some users of the library would not want to also install a script. And at this point, the library is pretty widely used so I'm hesitant to push a script onto all installations.One thing I'm wondering is why App::Session::Token is distributed separately from Session::Token; no big deal for us to have Yet Another Package but putting a script into the distribution with the library seems to be quite common.
Cheers,
Doug