Re: Policy Weekly Issue #4/8: Dates in package versions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 25 Oct 1997, Ian Jackson wrote:
> No. It is not for us to determine what the upstream version number
> scheme should be (though we can say what we might like), and since it
> is our policy to try to keep the upstream version number intact as
> much as possible it is NOT a bug if this results in us using a version
> number with a 2-digit year.
"we might like" -> wishlist -> bug of type wishlist.
Therefore it is a "bug" in the sense that it may be reported through the
bug reporting system.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNFMfDSqK7IlOjMLFAQGRswP/V6jRn1TfwBy+44UV+9VrNhsf5jFEcjEM
51Cc++omWfml9gyQax2fqnvHuDO0mpUimuoiWTGlwrD3wXxojb0s6WHSyD/mNQw0
Jq1VF3WfKJE36TAijnALJhANih7j+xkR2qR+5O3XOwdc2ZLPGbNb3iFVEu/d8jxN
d9R9ym/SV2A=
=KxtU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: