Re: What RMS says about standards (was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: Questions regarding free documentation.]
"Raul" == Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:
> Raul> I think that /usr/doc/copyright/* should be on the most minimal
> Raul> binary CD. Standards documents can go on a separate CD, but
> Raul> asking that these copyrights go on a separate CD is asking too
> Raul> much.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> Fine. However, this is not how we do things now, if the binary
> distributon becomes multiCD, as it is threatening to. Since those
> files live in base-files, it shall be in only one CD -- so we do need
> to change things around to meet your new requirement.
Eh? I'm having trouble understanding "how we do things now, if the
binary distribution becomes multiCD".
Right now, /usr/doc/copyright/{GPL,LGPL,..} is a part of base-files,
which is an essential package, and it's on the base disks (at least
that's the way it is in the "current" disks-i386 in hamm).
I don't think that I'm expressing a new requirement.
--
Raul
Reply to: