Re: What RMS says about standards (was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: Questions regarding free documentation.]
Manoj writes:
> I beg to disagree with this assesment. I was under the
> imprtession that we were moving towards the verbatim solution; with
> allowances being made to ensure that licenses were distributed with
> the software that required them.
I thought that we had pretty much agreed on verbatim but that there was
still some disagreement as to whether it should viewed as part of main.
I think it should.
--
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
Reply to: