Re: Kachina Technologies as a maintainer
Hi,
>>"J" == J H M Dassen <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl> writes:
J> On Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 05:14:03AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>> The easiest way would be for each of you to apply as maintainer and
>> maintain the packages as a group - which is not yet allowed by policy.
>> *sigh*
J> *sigh* indeed. Policy needs to be fixed then.
J> Several packages are succesfully maintained by a maintainer group (e.g.
J> egcs, bootdisks). As a concession to policy, one maintainer is named as the
J> "primary" maintainer (usually listing an email address that expands to the
J> maintainer group).
Funnily enough, the policy document itself is maintained by
this list, which does not even have a fixed set of people (and,
incidentally, that set of peole contains those that are not Debian
maintainers either).
Certainly, policy shjould be changed. A proposal, anyone?
manoj
--
You recoil from the crude; you tend naturally toward the exquisite.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: