On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 06:59:09PM -0400, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Michael Bramer <grisu@debian.org> writes:
> > > /usr/share/icons/. Such icons should have a name that is specific to
> > > that package. (so "icon.xpm" should only be used by the "icon"
> >
> > or better:
> > Such icons should start with a name that is specific to
> > that package.
>
> Ok; I'll accept this modification. (As long as it's understood that
> "specific to the package" need not just mean the package name - for
> example, all the windowmaker-ish packages could use just the prefix
> "wm-", so long as all the maintainers of windowmaker-ish packages
> coordinated to avoid naming collisions. I prefer to let the
> packagers' own judgement determine what is and isn't a
> package-specific name.)
ok.
> So how many seconds do I need?
from the 'Policy update guidelines' from Manoj Srivastav:
3.1. Proposing amendments to the Policy
---------------------------------------
Unlike before, when the policy editor gathered in issues which, in his
view, were candidates for inclusion in policy, I propose that issues
are brought up in the policy group, and, if the initial discussion
warrants it, any developer, with at least two(?) seconds can formally
propose as a policy amendment.
^^^^^^
Grisu
--
Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
PGP: finger grisu@master.debian.org -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux
"Science is the game we play with God to find out what His rules are."
Attachment:
pgpCkcOCcjMha.pgp
Description: PGP signature