Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote: > And it's the second part that we want to change in order to allow > non-interactive installation. But if we do not clearly > separate the first part from the second the only way of > non-interactive install will be to use the configuration database. Of course not: the postinst is not obligated to use a new configuration system. If it doesn't need it it can simply ignore it. > => this is really not standardized and may not be a good solution > but it may also be simpler than to create a registry with > all the configuration. If all we wanted was simplicity live would be easy... Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: wakkerma@wi.LeidenUniv.nl WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
Attachment:
pgpajGxsMrEbz.pgp
Description: PGP signature