Re: utmp group proposal
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 04:03:01PM -0700, Guy Maor wrote:
> Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net> writes:
>
> > This seems like *such* an obvious solution to so many problems that I
> > find myself perplexed why this hasn't done before, by others.
>
> Because it requires glibc 2.1 and kernel 2.2.
Which reminds me, we should probably make it clear that 2.0 kernels will
not work properly with potato if we do this. Maybe a big blinking orange
sign during installation or something. :)
Mike Stone
Reply to: