[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks



On Jun 23, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > Can you provide any positive arguments in *favor* of undocumented(7)?
> > We've been unable to find anyone who can justify it or explain why it
> > was adopted as policy in the first place.  But, of course, it *was*
> > adopted as policy at some point, so surely someone must have had a
> > reason, and many of us, including me, are rather curious what that
> > reason was.
> 
>  I agree with you, it makes no sense to have an undocumented(7) manpage...
> 
>  Er... should I remove it from the manpages package? Should I wait? =)

I'd wait for the outcome of this policy decision (especially since the
current policy mandates its use).


Chris
-- 
=============================================================================
|        Chris Lawrence        |             The Linux/m68k FAQ             |
|   <quango@watervalley.net>   |   http://www.linux-m68k.org/faq/faq.html   |
|                              |                                            |
|    Amiga A4000 604e/233Mhz   |   Visit the Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5:   |
|     with Linux/APUS 2.2.8    |   <*> http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/ <*>   |
=============================================================================


Reply to: