Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:10:51AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> It's section 4.2 of policy. The last couple of paragraphs are not at
> all clear on this point. While they say that the .la files should go
> in the -dev package, they also seem to encourage putting them in the
> runtime package instead.
>
> Maybe this one needs to go to -policy to thrash out.
By all means. We don't need anymore packages breaking because of the lack
of forceful wording to have these in the -dev package if they are used at
all.
Thanks
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org - collinbm@djj.state.va.us - bmc@visi.net '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: