[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Relation with non-existing packages



On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Example: There is no pine.deb but a pinepgp package should be
> > allowed to depend on it.
> 
> Okay, that sounds reasonable. How about only doing this for packages in
> main?

Do you mean that a package in main could depend on a package outside main?
That is against policy, AFAIK.

Remco


Reply to: