Bug#43787: well, here it is: alternate proposal (was: changed title...)
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Sep-99, 08:04 (CDT), Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Raul suggested to mention core dumps, which is indeed a good idea.
> > I extended this to give a general rationale for debugging symbols.
>
> [*snip* of suggested wording]
>
> While I don't feel a real strong objection, I don't think this kind of
> stuff (rationale) belongs in the standard. It's already wordy enough.
>
> Steve
I'de rather it be more on the "wordy" side than have developers saying "now
why in the hello do they want me to do that!?"
Ben
Reply to: