Re: On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)

To: Debian-Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)
From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 14:08:43 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990919140843.A503@usatoday.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990919004510.A16710@watervalley.net>
References: <[🔎] 19990917121759.A21389@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 19990918181320.E18363@icarus.soark.net> <[🔎] 19990918213837.B26602@frederick.itri.loyola.edu> <[🔎] 19990918194515.I18363@icarus.soark.net> <[🔎] 19990918232413.A16000@watervalley.net> <[🔎] 19990919004556.C23005@usatoday.com> <[🔎] 19990919004510.A16710@watervalley.net>

On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 12:45:10AM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> My point is simply that changing policy does not translate into making
> things happen by fiat.  Perhaps you missed the entire point of my
> mail, because it seems like we agree with each other.

*blush* yeah.

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

References:
- Weekly policy summary
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- static user IDs
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Re: static user IDs
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: static user IDs
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)
  - From: Chris Lawrence <quango@watervalley.net>
- Re: On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)
  - From: Chris Lawrence <quango@watervalley.net>

Prev by Date: Bug#45406: PROPOSAL] Config files must have manpages
Next by Date: Re: On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)
Previous by thread: Re: On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)
Next by thread: Re: On Policy Compliance (was Re: static user IDs)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread