Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:
> Is it? What does Debian have to do with EvilCorp that Red Hat or
> Slackware doesn't? Why is Debian getting singled out? Why haven't I seen
> the same thing on the FreeBSD lists? It looks as if RMS's goal it to make
> Debian his own private whipping boys again, just like the crusade about
> non-free being too easily available.
What makes you think that Debian is being singled out? I don't have
any knowledge about what RMS may have written to their leader, do you?
I don't think FreeBSD brings up the issue, because they don't
distribute any packages of binaries in the way Debian or RedHat do
IIUC.
Thomas
Reply to: