[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#69311: Woody is now clean of /usr/doc



Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> writes:

> The last package that installed a directory into /usr/doc in woody was
> fixed last night.

Cool.

>      3.   At a later date, another policy (say, 4.X) shall ask for
>           packages to no longer provide the link (and possibly remove
>           links from /usr/doc). We can also provide a script (possibly
>           in base-files postinst) that rm's symlinks from within
>           /usr/doc. woody+1 may ship with such a script. (there was a
>           proposal as well that potato+2 (woody+1) ships with just the
>           prerms, and not the base file script, and potato+3 ships
>           with the base-file script, but I am not sure this long a
>           reversion period is required).

There i must say: Please *dont* rm that. I hate the new location even
if i build my Packages for that. So i have usr/doc symlinked to
usr/share/doc on every machine. If there is something which deletes
things there without prior permission from me (like a package deinstall
or a debconf question if it can remove that) it is at least a critical
bug. No matter what policy says here. :)
No, you cant test for symlinks and remove only them, some packages uses
symlinks for their documentation. :)

Just my 2¢ :)

-- 
begin  OjE-ist-scheisse.txt
bye, Joerg
Registered Linux User #97793 @ http://counter.li.org
end


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: