* Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, 2010-07-07, 09:12:
+ <item>
+ The packages are the same version (both source and Debian
+ revision) with the possible exception of binary-only
+ rebuilds of one of the packages, since otherwise
+ the <file>changelog.Debian.gz</file> in one of the two
+ packages would not be the changelog for the latest version.
+ This requires a dependency that ensures exactly the right
+ version of the other package be installed. For a dependency
+ between two binary-dependent packages, use:
+ <example>
+Depends: foo (= ${binary:Version})
+ </example>
+ For a dependency between two architecture-independent
+ packages or from an architecture-dependent package to an
+ architecture-independent package, use:
+ <example>
+Depends: foo (= ${source:Version})
+ </example>
+ Putting the symlink in an architecture-independent package
+ and the documentation directory in an architecture-dependent
+ package should be avoided if the documentation can be moved
+ to an architecture-independent package instead, but if
+ required, a dependency similar to:
+ <example>
+Depends: foo (>= ${source:Version}), foo (<< ${source:Version}+b99)
+ </example>
+ can be used.
+ </item>
This encourages arch:any -> arch:all symlinks, which is exactly what I wanted to be disallowed.
-- Jakub Wilk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature