Bug#679326: debian-policy: DMUA should covered more explicitly
Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> writes:
> Besides being a bug in the GR to formulate way too much how the
> implementation goes, looking at the actual text of what we voted on, it
> always says "the initial policy is ...". That point had been discussed
> in various places and the usual outcome was "Yeah, can change it due to
> that". As long as the functionality is given, which is. Technically
> even better than before.
...okay, I'm embarassed now. How the heck did I miss that qualification?
It would help if I actually read the GRs that I was complaining about and
paid attention.
> Or is (my|our) reading here that wrong?
I was definitely reading it wrong. That certainly resolves all of my
(unimportant) concern. Sorry about the noise!
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: