[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#776557: debian-policy: Please clarify 2.5 'unix heritage >= important'



Package: debian-policy
Severity: important

Hi,

the following sentence in 2.5 leave much room for maneuver, therefor i
would like to see a clarification how it should be interpreted:

| Important programs, including those which one would expect to find on
| any Unix-like system. If the expectation is that an experienced Unix
| person who found it missing would say "What on earth is going on, where
| is foo?", it must be an important package.

Background here is, that i moved the package "ed" to optional years ago,
and now have bug #776413 open, which disagrees on that move. I would
like to keep "ed" in optional, but also see the arguments the submitter
gave here. 

Hoping for your assistance,

Martin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.18.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
 Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@debian.org>    Debian System Administrator
 Debian & GNU/Linux Developer                       Debian Listmaster
 http://about.me/zobel                               Debian Webmaster
 GPG Fingerprint:  6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D  BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: