[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements



control: tag -1 + pending

Hello,

On Thu 01 Apr 2021 at 10:44AM -07, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
>
>> In attempting to revise recent GRs to use the same terminology as
>> Policy, I got frustrated again by the lack of precision of our current
>> language.  This is an attempt to make a minor improvement.  It doesn't
>> go all the way to using all-caps terms the way that RFC 2119 does; I
>> think that might be an improvement, but it was a larger change than I
>> wanted to tackle.
>
> It's been over a year since the last activity on this bug so although
> there were enough seconds for a revised form of this patch, I'm reposting
> it to remind people where the discussion was and as a quick double-check
> that I didn't mess up the rebase.

Thank you for confirming you are okay with changing d/missing-sources
back and for rebasing the series -- now merged to 'next'.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: