Bug#1064593: debian-policy: missing static resources for www.debian.org policy page
Hello,
On Sun 25 Feb 2024 at 02:24pm +01, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Seems there is more than only one issue:
>
> 1.
> In the binary package (debian-policy latest version) the above files and
> directories are existing, but the files are all empty (0 B size).
> However, in the previous version (4.6.2.0) the javascript .js files
> are also empty (0 B), so that's most probably not the issue.
> I remember we don't have full javascript functionality in our sphinx-based
> manuals on debian.org for a longer time, search is not working for example.
> That's #1026446, #872944, #987943.
>
> In a local build here, they are all fine, and the document is displayed
> correctly. But that's build on bookworm, so sphinx version 5.3.0.
> The binary packages built by buildd will get build on sphinx 7.2.x
> I think, so maybe there is the difference?
> Maybe we need some adaption for latest sphinx version?
>
>
> 2.
> The first file from above list _static/css/theme.css is likely to be
> the point, since the html layout is completely broken.
> That file is also empty in latest debian-policy binary package.
> Since it is fine in local build here, also an issue with latest sphinx
> version maybe ???
> Or do we no longer need _static/css/theme.css, as we now have
> _static/debian.css ?
>
>
> 3.
> Despite the fact, that the files from above are empty, there seems to be
> another issue with debian.org website:
> the subdirectories under _static are not existing on debian.org, as well as
> the files within of course (like _static/css/theme.css).
> Apparently there is some more magic needed in webmaster-team's cron
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/blob/master/parts/7doc?ref_type=heads#L319
> to get such files copied over to debian.org during website build.
>
> But first, we need to have a working version in the binary package,
> since that's the basis for website build.
I guess I should have done a debdiff huh? :)
Thank you for the analysis. Osamu, Stéphane, could you take a look?
Thank you.
--
Sean Whitton
Reply to: