[jim@ic.uva.nl: Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness]
This came from the slang1 maintainer. Apparently its simply a matter
of rebuilding the packages that want slang1 << 1.3.
----- Forwarded message from Jim Mintha <jim@ic.uva.nl> -----
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 23:21:22 +0100
From: Jim Mintha <jim@ic.uva.nl>
To: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness
Message-ID: <19991206232122.A9589@ic.uva.nl>
References: <[🔎] 19991206170931.A1056@blackrider.aocn.com> <[🔎] 19991206164500.A18828@toldyouso.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 19991206164500.A18828@toldyouso.com>; from Michael G Schwern on Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 04:45:00PM -0500
Sender: jim@hestia.ic.uva.nl
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 04:45:00PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Oh dear, I'm an idiot. I just realized that dselect was warning me
> -not- to upgrade slang because of the dependency problem with
> upgrading. Still, will I have to perpetually hold slang1 back?
There was a problem with the slang 1.2.x packages that created the
wrong dependency < 1.3 when you created a package with them. I
uploaded a corrected 1.2.2-3 and got everyone to recompile their slang
dependent packages. As far as I know all the packages have been
recompiled, but perhaps they are not yet build for powerpc.
Jim
--
Jim Mintha Email: jim@ic.uva.nl
System Administrator Work: +31 20 525-4919
Informatiseringscentrum Home: +31 20 662-3892
University of Amsterdam Debian GNU/Linux: jmintha@debian.org
_There are always Possibilities_ http://jim.ultralinux.org
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Michael G Schwern schwern@pobox.com
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
/(?:(?:(1)[.-]?)?\(?(\d{3})\)?[.-]?)?(\d{3})[.-]?(\d{4})(x\d+)?/i
Reply to: