Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2

To: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2
From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:27:07 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 53FDDCAB.1030607@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140827025418.GA2360@debian.org>
References: <E1XKyHS-00038b-Iu@quantz.debian.org> <[🔎] 20140823145927.GB22977@debian.org> <[🔎] 53FCC764.4090702@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <[🔎] 20140827025418.GA2360@debian.org>

On 08/26/2014 11:54 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:

OK. I applied that, and submittted it for review upstream as well.


Thank you!  I see it in ruby-ffi's debian source repo.

cheers,

--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

Reply to:

References:
- Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2
  - From: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
- Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2
  - From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2
  - From: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2
Next by Date: Re: --with autotools_dev,autoreconf : bad idea? (ppc64el FTBFS)
Previous by thread: Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2
Next by thread: --with autotools_dev,autoreconf : bad idea? (ppc64el FTBFS)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread