[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#814702: ghostscript: FTBFS on sparc64 due to mismatched symbols file



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 02/15/2016 03:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Shouldn't it be this instead?:
> 
> (arch=!sparc,!sparc64)hdr_id@Base 9.16~dfsg

I have re-checked a previous patch, you're right, but without the comma:

(arch=!sparc !sparc64)hdr_id@Base 9.16~dfsg

is correct.

See, for example libechonest [1].

Thanks,
Adrian

> 
http://sources.debian.net/src/libechonest/2.3.1-0.3/debian/libechonest2.
3.symbols/

- -- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=+goZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: