Bug#1025572: packages with dependencies on transitional policykit-1 package
- To: 1025545@bugs.debian.org, 1025548@bugs.debian.org, 1025550@bugs.debian.org, 1025551@bugs.debian.org, 1025552@bugs.debian.org, 1025555@bugs.debian.org, 1025558@bugs.debian.org, 1025559@bugs.debian.org, 1025561@bugs.debian.org, 1025563@bugs.debian.org, 1025564@bugs.debian.org, 1025565@bugs.debian.org, 1025566@bugs.debian.org, 1025568@bugs.debian.org, 1025571@bugs.debian.org, 1025572@bugs.debian.org, 1025573@bugs.debian.org, 1025574@bugs.debian.org, 1025576@bugs.debian.org, 1025581@bugs.debian.org, 1025582@bugs.debian.org, 1025583@bugs.debian.org, 1025589@bugs.debian.org, 1025597@bugs.debian.org, 1025599@bugs.debian.org, 1025600@bugs.debian.org, 1025602@bugs.debian.org, 1025603@bugs.debian.org, 1025604@bugs.debian.org, 1025606@bugs.debian.org, 1025627@bugs.debian.org, 1025628@bugs.debian.org, 1025631@bugs.debian.org, 1025633@bugs.debian.org, 1025635@bugs.debian.org, 1025638@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1025572: packages with dependencies on transitional policykit-1 package
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 13:12:25 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] ZIW6KOT07gpkzGNw@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- Reply-to: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>, 1025572@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <Y48/ApYlpg5VdRMz@momentum.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- References: <Y48/ApYlpg5VdRMz@momentum.pseudorandom.co.uk> <Y49Eb5ZK3ebOwDWQ@momentum.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + trixie sid
On Tue, 06 Dec 2022 at 13:09:22 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> This package has a Depends on the transitional package policykit-1, which
> has been separated into polkitd, pkexec and (deprecated) polkitd-pkla
> packages.
Now that bookworm has been released, I'm intending to remove the
policykit-1 transitional package during the trixie cycle, so I'm raising
the severity of depends/recommends on the transitional package to
important. The severity will increase to serious later on.
(I'm doing this for packages with only a Recommends too, even though those
don't technically prevent removal of policykit-1, because a Recommends
on a package that no longer exists is not allowed under Policy §2.2.1.)
smcv
Reply to: