Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2024 21:45:14 -0600 with message-id <4917057.31r3eYUQgx@riemann> and subject line Re: Bug#721137: ghostscript: ps2pdf produces bad pdf on x86_64 (unreadeable text) has caused the Debian Bug report #721137, regarding ghostscript: ps2pdf produces bad pdf on x86_64 (unreadeable text) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 721137: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721137 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ghostscript: ps2pdf produces bad pdf on x86_64 (unreadeable text)
- From: Geoffroy Desvernay <dgeo@centrale-marseille.fr>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:08:44 +0200
- Message-id: <20130828120844.8141.44157.reportbug@gaby224.etu.ec-m.fr>
Package: ghostscript Version: 9.05~dfsg-6.3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Trying to produce a pdf file as usual (latex, dvi2ps then ps2pdf). Worked like a charm on squeeze. here my test postscript document (produced from latex then dvi2ps): http://dgeo.perso.ec-m.fr/tp2A_scilab_N1.ps . ps2pdf from a i386 install of wheezy works too (9.05~dfsg-6.3): http://dgeo.perso.ec-m.fr/tp2A_scilab_N1.wheezy_i386.pdf ps2pdf from a squeeze install used to work ps2pdf from a freebsd amd64 workstation works as expected (ghostscript 9.06 there): http://dgeo.perso.ec-m.fr/tp2A_scilab_N1.freebsd_gs_9.06.pdf for this document it can be worked around with pdflatex (good pdf output) -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ghostscript depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.49 ii debianutils 4.3.2 ii gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.2 ii libc6 2.13-38 ii libgs9 9.05~dfsg-6.3 ghostscript recommends no packages. Versions of packages ghostscript suggests: ii ghostscript-cups 9.05~dfsg-6.3 ii ghostscript-x 9.05~dfsg-6.3 ii hpijs 3.12.6-3.1 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 721137-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#721137: ghostscript: ps2pdf produces bad pdf on x86_64 (unreadeable text)
- From: Steven Robbins <steve@sumost.ca>
- Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 21:45:14 -0600
- Message-id: <4917057.31r3eYUQgx@riemann>
- In-reply-to: <331532228.401465631.1379429840586.JavaMail.root@zimbra19-e3.priv.proxad.net>
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:57:20 +0200 (CEST) whoami314@free.fr wrote: > > Hello again, > > I took a few minutes to minimize my own example of unreadable pdf. > I ended with a quite bare test.tex: > > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} > \begin{document} > Bla Bla Bla > \end{document} > > Please find attached this file, plus the corresponding test.ps > obtained via "latex test && dvips test.dvi" and the test.pdf produced > by "ps2pdf test.ps". I repeated this test using Debian sid and xpdf no longer complains about the bounding box. Therefore I am closing this on the assumption that the postscript itself was buggy in some fashion. Presumably the new latex version emits better conforming postscript? I've attached the ps obtained from latex && dvips, along with the pdf from ps2pdf. The latex version run is: pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.25 (TeX Live 2023/Debian) (preloaded format=latex 2024.2.24) 3 MAR 2024 21:39 Regards, -Steve > > As previously, evince doesn't display correctly the text of this test.pdf: > you only see a few (bottom?) black pixels for each letter. With xpdf the display > is ok, but with warnings about "Bad bounding box in Type 3 glyph". > > This definitively looks like a font issue, since without the > "\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}" line the display is back to normal. > > Best regards, > Pierre > &references=<331532228.401465631.1379429840586.JavaMail.root@zimbra19- e3.priv.proxad.net>Attachment: test.ps
Description: PostScript documentAttachment: test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF documentAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---