Re: Member distributions and popularity
----- "Sven Luther" <sven@powerlinux.fr> wrote:
> What about also listing in the same area, but under a different header,
> those distros which are debian based, but don't follow the above rule ?
> This would allow us to put more visibility on the fact that those
> distros are debian derivatives to some degree, even if they don't
> advertise that fact, and i think would have a positive impact on the PR
> value of this effort. We don't necessarily will go in as much detail as
> we would for "official debian derivatives".
I don't think that would be a problem... but the point is specifically to promote those distributions that maintain a good working relationship (and some level of compatibility) with us.
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com
ean@brainfood.com - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315
Reply to: