On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:56:47 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: [...] > However, it does not indicate which of the objecctions raised were considered > valid by the FTP team (there are sometimes differences of point of view between > the expressed opinions on debian-legal and the FTP team decisions), nor it > indicates what was changed in 3.0, which adressed Debian's concerns. [...] There are indeed differences between the expressed opinions on debian-legal and the FTP team decisions. For instance, in the case at hand, I personally disagree with the FTP masters: they consider CC-by-v3.0 and CC-by-sa-v3.0 as acceptable in main, while I don't think that those two licenses meet the DFSG. I tried to get an explanation of their decision in the past: http://bugs.debian.org/431794#16 Unfortunately, I got no reply at all, which is really frustrating, after all the time I spent in analyzing CC licenses... :-( P.S.: I am not subscribed to debian-project, so please Cc me on replies, if any. Thanks. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpRjHoB1VvPV.pgp
Description: PGP signature