❦ 21 mai 2016 14:55 +0800, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> : >> For some languages, embedded copies are a pattern. Notably Go. But there >> is also the omnibus stance: the embedded copy could not be in the >> source, but could be in the shipped artifact. This includes Go, JS and >> Java (when using uberjars). For some other ecosystems, the embedded copy >> is more the exception than the rule (C, C++, Python). > > By shipped artifact, it sounds like you are talking about source > packages? or do you mean binary packages? I meant binary packages but wanted to be more general (not limited to Debian). >> If upstream is using embedded copies, they are quite unlikely to make >> any effort tu undo this aspect. > > I see upstreams doing that on debian-mentors reasonably often, > especially when the upstream is the one doing the RFS. For upstreams > who aren't interested in getting their software into Debian, that is > definitely the case. I shouldn't have made a generality. Some upstreams are more receptive than others to this problematic. -- Each module should do one thing well. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature