[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pypy pakages



On Tue, 10 May 2016 at 23:29 Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> wrote:
Hi Michael (2016.05.10_19:23:33_+0200)
> is there a specific reason why there are so few pypy-* packages in the
> archive? Is it just a lack of interest or are any practical reasons not
> to have them?

I think we're all kind of waiting for PyPy 3, so that we don't have to
bring up an entire stack of packages (that few people are going to use).

Personally, I've crated a couple, just to be sure that it all works
correctly.

I've added pypy-* packages to all of my packages that I can, the rest are missing dependencies. I think it would be great if we could get performance-sensitive applications running on PyPy instead of CPython, but of course this requires the whole dependency graph to have pypy-* packages built.

Reply to: