On 2/24/22 6:10 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Sorry for dragging you into this - the experimental branch was way advanced which I learned in bug #995675. This leaves the question how we can proceed. It makes probably sense to run ratt or something like this to learn about packages that are broken.
Looks like I made some wasted effort there :/ Although, Michael's changes are pretty similar to mine
Unfortunately I did never got ratt working (since I failed to setup sbuild properly).
Would be nice if you could do this. There's also a ruby-team/meta[1] these are all shell scripts so maybe you could use maybe you can replace sbuild with pdebuild (or whatever you use) and try
On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if we do not act upon the issue. So may be we should upload to unstable? What do you think?
Pseudo excuses do not look too bad[2] and package in testing this is broken anyway, you can upload IMO [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta [2]: https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#rdflib Regards, Nilesh
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature