Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?)
On 2022-07-03 00 h 49, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 在 2022-06-28星期二的 09:24 -0400，Boyuan Yang写道：
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
>> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
>> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
>>
>> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
>> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
>> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that,
>> what
>> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
>> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
>> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
>
> As an update, I also pushed pdm package [3] as well as several of its build-
> dependencies into the NEW queue.
>
> [3] http://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm
Nice!
As I'm sure people will confuse "python3-pdm" (the cli tool) and
"python3-pdm-pep517" (the tool used to build packages), I've created a
Lintian tag:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/401
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
Reply to: