Hi Thomas! On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > See this message: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042585;msg=7 > and this comment from Dmitry Shachnev: > # Dear Maintainers, I am going to upload Sphinx 7.2.6 to unstable next weekend. > # That will make these packages FTBFS in sid, which is a release-critical bug. > # The new docutils will be uploaded after Sphinx migrates to testing. Yes, I wanted to warn in advance about the upcoming uploads and about the fact that this upload will make the non-fixed packages RC-buggy. The email sent by BTS should have included my comment. This is what I got: ----------8<---------- Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > # Dear Maintainers, I am going to upload Sphinx 7.2.6 to unstable next weekend. > # That will make these packages FTBFS in sid, which is a release-critical bug. > # The new docutils will be uploaded after Sphinx migrates to testing. > severity 1042585 serious Bug #1042585 [src:python-i3ipc] python-i3ipc: FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20... Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' [...] ---------->8---------- On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 01:08:34PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I'm not really sure what's going on, but I saw many packages marked as > RC buggy with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20, however, both are still in > Experimental, not in Unstable. I tried rebuilding those, and in built > fine. I therefore closed the bugs. On one of the closed bugs, I replied to you (#1043075). What other bugs did you close? Will you mind if I reopen them, or you will do that yourself? Also, they built successfully in sid, i.e. with old Sphinx, right? -- Dmitry Shachnev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature