Bug#265968: marked as done (rdiff-backup: Can't restore incremental backups)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:25:41 -0400
with message-id <20040816212541.GB24693@thened.net>
and subject line Inproper command?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2004 00:31:27 +0000
>From change@nas.com Sun Aug 15 17:31:27 2004
Return-path: <change@nas.com>
Received: from edoras.nas.com [66.114.32.34]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BwVPK-0007EA-00; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:31:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by edoras.nas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 08D41EB54D; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edoras.nas.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (edoras.nas.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 64703-07; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from debian1.loaner.com (dsl-47-134.nas.com [66.114.47.134])
by edoras.nas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8A02CEB542; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kingsley by debian1.loaner.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BwVPK-0003g8-00; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:31:26 -0700
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:31:26 -0700
From: "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <change@nas.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: bescoto@stanford.edu
Subject: rdiff-backup: Can't restore incremental backups
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040816003126.GA12681@nas.com>
Reply-To: "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <change@nas.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.43
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Sender: "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <kingsley@debian1.loaner.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nas.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.4-3
Severity: critical
Tags: sid
Justification: causes serious data loss
Thanks for maintaining rdiff-backup.
It's concept is great.
The main reason I'm writing is to report that, at
least on my box, rdiff-backup seems to be unable
to restore incremental backups.
I suspect that I'm doing something wrong, but,
since no one knows if they can restore data until
they try and the consequences of failing can be
severe, I decided to email you.
For example, when I type:
$ rdiff-backup --restore-as-of 3M /etc/passwd /tmp
it reports:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/rdiff-backup", line 23, in ?
rdiff_backup.Main.Main(sys.argv[1:])
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 259, in Main
take_action(rps)
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 239, in take_action
elif action == "restore-as-of": Restore(rps[0], rps[1], 1)
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 451, in Restore
if not restore_root_set: assert restore_set_root(src_rp)
AssertionError
However, incremental files exist:
$ ls -l /mnt/backup/rdiff-backup-data/increments/etc/passwd*
reports:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 259 Aug 16 2003 /mnt/backup/rdiff-backup-data/increments/etc/passwd-.2004-07-07T01:21:01-07:00.diff.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 399 Aug 16 2003 /mnt/backup/rdiff-backup-data/increments/etc/passwd.2004-07-07T01:21:01-07:00.diff.gz
Thanks,
Kingsley
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii librsync1 0.9.6-8 Binary diff library based on the r
ii python2.3 2.3.1-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii rdiff 0.9.5-2 Binary diff tool for signature-bas
-- no debconf information
--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265968-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2004 21:26:29 +0000
>From alec@thened.net Mon Aug 16 14:26:29 2004
Return-path: <alec@thened.net>
Received: from mail.bowdoin.edu [139.140.14.83]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bwozt-0007KP-00; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:26:29 -0700
Received: from splinter (rocksteady.bowdoin.edu [139.140.34.45])
by mail.bowdoin.edu
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))
with ESMTP id <0I2K00HT66786I@mail.bowdoin.edu> for
265968-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:25:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by splinter (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A039D6D3; Mon,
16 Aug 2004 17:25:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:25:41 -0400
From: Alec Berryman <alec@thened.net>
Subject: Inproper command?
To: 265968-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-id: <20040816212541.GB24693@thened.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 with kernel 2.6.7-1-686
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4
X-GPG-Key: http://www.thened.net/~alec/static/alec.asc
Delivered-To: 265968-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Kingsley,
Thanks for reporting.
You said that the command you ran was:
rdiff-backup --restore-as-of 3M /etc/passwd /tmp
I believe your problem is that rdiff-backup is interpreting
'/etc/passwd' as the location of the backup to restore. If you wanted
to restore the file '/etc/passwd' from '/mnt/backup' (which is where
you said backups were being made), you ought to use:
rdiff-backup --restore-as-of 3M /mnt/backup/etc/passwd /tmp
I'm going to mark this bug as done; let me know if I've incorrectly
interpreted your report.
Thanks,
Alec
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBISZVAud/2YgchcQRAnFbAJ9eBLZWyxUzN3O6sZnzoeQvI5J5UACfW9NZ
KB4cnOb0rmwt+BDbMTuJtqA=
=p1f+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX--
Reply to: