[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#724059: openbox-dev: should include librsvg-2.0-dev on his build-depends



Control: reassign -1 src:openbox

On Du, 22 sep 13, 17:22:59, David Suárez wrote:
> Source: openbox-dev
> Version: 3.5.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie sid
> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130825 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: affects various FTBFS on amd64
> Affects: -1 lxappearance-obconf obconf
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, the "lxappearance-obconf" and 
> "obconf" packages FTBFS due to some bug on openbox-dev.
> 
> Example failed log output:
> 
> > checking for gmsgfmt... (cached) /usr/bin/msgfmt
> > checking for xgettext... (cached) /usr/bin/xgettext
> > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> > checking for OPENBOX... no
> > configure: error: Package requirements (obrender-3.5 >= 3.5 obt-3.5 >= 3.5) 
> were not met
> >>
> > Package librsvg-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `librsvg-2.0.pc'
> > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> > Package 'librsvg-2.0', required by 'ObRender', not found
> >
> > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> > installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> >
> > Alternatively, you may set the environment variables OPENBOX_CFLAGS
> > and OPENBOX_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> > See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> 
> Extract from obrender-3.5.pc file included in the openbox-dev package:
> 
> > Requires: obt-3.5 glib-2.0 xft pangoxft imlib2 librsvg-2.0
> 
> I suspect that openbox-dev should include librsvg-2.0-dev as their build-
> depends.
> 
> David

-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: