[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#824330: marked as done (dnprogs: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Thu, 06 Jul 2017 20:49:29 +0000
with message-id <E1dTDiL-0000Xt-Ge@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#824330: fixed in dnprogs 2.65
has caused the Debian Bug report #824330,
regarding dnprogs: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
824330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824330
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: dnprogs
Tags: l10n patch
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

Please, Could you update the Brazilian Portuguese Translation?

Attached you will find the file pt_BR.po. It is UTF-8 encoded and it is
tested with msgfmt and podebconf-display-po.

Kind regards.

Attachment: pt_BR.po.gz
Description: application/gzip

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: dnprogs
Source-Version: 2.65

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dnprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 824330@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> (supplier of updated dnprogs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 22:42:10 +0300
Source: dnprogs
Binary: dnet-common dnet-progs libdnet libdnet-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 2.65
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Description:
 dnet-common - Base package for Linux DECnet
 dnet-progs - DECnet user programs and daemons
 libdnet    - DECnet Libraries
 libdnet-dev - DECnet development libraries & Headers
Closes: 824330 867326
Changes:
 dnprogs (2.65) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Makefile.common: Manually enable DNETUSE_DEVPTS, autodetection
     was broken by multiarch. Thanks to Adam Pigg for the report.
     (Closes: #867326)
   * Add lsb-base dependencies to dnet-common and dnet-progs.
   * Add Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
     from Adriano Rafael Gomes. (Closes: #824330)
Checksums-Sha1:
 3ecdc960124e4bffea421fd8bf3a7857c7e9a122 1609 dnprogs_2.65.dsc
 e1cc7234d69d04170abdd844612068ce5558a460 706851 dnprogs_2.65.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 49d66cc7acc9bee17f9738bb81d4aa4ba5db3039cf50d4a044b846642da3c2b1 1609 dnprogs_2.65.dsc
 258a27cb4534dc6299499d8117abb6ee5ee3781139809ce27db1906fb5c5adfd 706851 dnprogs_2.65.tar.gz
Files:
 61754f34655d15f45929804730ba597c 1609 net extra dnprogs_2.65.dsc
 9341b91d9c5a3b81689531e253dea84b 706851 net extra dnprogs_2.65.tar.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=m7Es
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: