Bug#923492: Codelites desktop file is missing the additional category 'IDE'
Package: codelite
Version: 12.0+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello!
The desktop file for Linux is missing the additional category 'IDE' which is a sub-category of 'Development'. Please see the documentation about desktop files here:
<https://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apas02.html>
This category should be added.
- --
Yours sincerely
Joerg Schiermeier
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de:en_GB (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages codelite depends on:
ii libc6 2.28-7
ii libclang1-7 1:7.0.1-6
ii libgcc1 1:8.2.0-20
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.32-3
ii libssh-gcrypt-4 0.8.6-3
ii libstdc++6 8.2.0-20
ii libwxbase3.0-0v5 3.0.4+dfsg-8
ii libwxgtk3.0-0v5 3.0.4+dfsg-8
ii libwxsqlite3-3.0-0 3.4.1~dfsg-3
Versions of packages codelite recommends:
ii eterm [x-terminal-emulator] 0.9.6-5
ii g++ 4:8.2.0-2
ii gcc 4:8.2.0-2
ii gdb 8.2.1-1
ii konsole [x-terminal-emulator] 4:18.04.0-1
ii lxterminal [x-terminal-emulator] 0.3.2-1
ii mrxvt [x-terminal-emulator] 0.5.4-2
ii qterminal [x-terminal-emulator] 0.14.0-1
ii rxvt-unicode [x-terminal-emulator] 9.22-4+b1
ii sakura [x-terminal-emulator] 3.6.0-3
ii termit [x-terminal-emulator] 3.0-1+b1
ii wx-common 3.0.4+dfsg-8
ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 343-1
Versions of packages codelite suggests:
ii codelite-plugins 12.0+dfsg-1
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=OiwI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: