[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#956010: marked as done (zpb-ttf: Packaging licensing should be changed)



Your message dated Fri, 17 Apr 2020 21:52:47 +0000
with message-id <E1jPYul-0003uk-Tn@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#956010: fixed in zpb-ttf 0.7-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #956010,
regarding zpb-ttf: Packaging licensing should be changed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
956010: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956010
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zpb-ttf
Severity: normal

The zpb-ttf is under BSD-2-Clause but the packaging is under GPL-2+ license.
GPL-2 in packaging is incompatible with the upstream development if needed
send patches to the author.

I am opening this bug with a CC to previous maintainer in Debian to ask if
someone has any objection to change the licensing in Debian packaging
(to BSD-2-Clause). IMO, this is the best option to interact with the upstream.

I will wait 10 days to know if anyone has any objection.

Thanks!

Regards,

Eriberto

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zpb-ttf
Source-Version: 0.7-5
Done: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zpb-ttf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 956010@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org> (supplier of updated zpb-ttf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:20:51 -0300
Source: zpb-ttf
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>
Closes: 956010
Changes:
 zpb-ttf (0.7-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/copyright: changed packaging licensing from GPL-2+ to BSD-2-Clause.
     (Closes: #956010)
   * debian/upstream/metadata: created.
Checksums-Sha1:
 8b2865f863c1bf9c3310e81609083dcd3bb1f9d1 1835 zpb-ttf_0.7-5.dsc
 2e5dd052c9d589213b67d70c81b73d3c348a21da 2604 zpb-ttf_0.7-5.debian.tar.xz
 e9c1a23ee6f117aacf1c0c3e618d31d4dd3b2a10 5344 zpb-ttf_0.7-5_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 a0c205857e13c978fe8861c37b936093492c330bbbbba81fef6a6d13afdcd3f7 1835 zpb-ttf_0.7-5.dsc
 af7d54dc0e44eb843072dac2e2fe867086f1c16d2eae3cba138122cf8d335661 2604 zpb-ttf_0.7-5.debian.tar.xz
 2da878dd573ee8b123b2f969d5beca883fa3112714293894b7af88d17d5f4057 5344 zpb-ttf_0.7-5_source.buildinfo
Files:
 d73cae63b3ede5965ba0fc18931c7f4f 1835 libs optional zpb-ttf_0.7-5.dsc
 ece6458b367aa538572b978ef081bcf1 2604 libs optional zpb-ttf_0.7-5.debian.tar.xz
 9dc99f7822a9ab90da3211730472ac40 5344 libs optional zpb-ttf_0.7-5_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wTyK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: