Bug#972870: Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye?

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#972870: Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye?
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 17:13:36 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 160363881635.4896.5897844007548226911.reportbug@localhost>
Reply-to: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>, 972870@bugs.debian.org

Package: libhal1-flash
Version: 0.3.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: bullseye sid

This package was needed for older versions of Flash,
which itself is both EOL before the release of bullseye
and already no longer supported by any major browser.

Reply to:

Prev by Date: hal-flash_0.3.3-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by Date: Bug#971102: marked as done (apvlv: FTBFS: ApvlvPdf.cc:32:10: fatal error: goo/gtypes.h: No such file or directory)
Previous by thread: hal-flash_0.3.3-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by thread: Bug#971102: marked as done (apvlv: FTBFS: ApvlvPdf.cc:32:10: fatal error: goo/gtypes.h: No such file or directory)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread